Yatırımcı.AI

DZM vs NSD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

DZMNSD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DZM vs NSD Fund Comparison
MetricDZMNSDCategory median
Daily0.08%0.07%0.06%
1 week0.73%0.49%0.56%
1 month2.61%2.43%1.84%
3 months4.78%6.35%3.29%
6 months10.60%13.95%7.90%
YTD17.75%22.29%17.53%
1 year22.31%25.22%21.48%
3 years152.59%108.81%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DZM vs NSD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DZM leads in 6 and NSD leads in 4. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DZM leads (0.08% vs 0.07%). 1 week: DZM leads (0.73% vs 0.49%). 1 month: DZM leads (2.61% vs 2.43%). 3 months: NSD leads (6.35% vs 4.78%). 6 months: NSD leads (13.95% vs 10.60%). YTD: NSD leads (22.29% vs 17.75%). 1 year: NSD leads (25.22% vs 22.31%). 3 years: DZM leads (152.59% vs 108.81%). Size (TRY): DZM leads (10.4B vs 10.2B). Investors: DZM leads (3,223 vs 120).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DZM returned 17.75% and NSD returned 22.29%; over the last year DZM returned 22.31% and NSD returned 25.22%. Over the last month DZM returned 2.61% and NSD returned 2.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 10.4B with 3,223 investors, while NSD has a size of TRY 10.2B with 120 investors. DZM leads in size and DZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DZM is 3 out of 7 and that of NSD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.