Yatırımcı.AI

DZM vs FSF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

DZMFSF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DZM vs FSF Fund Comparison
MetricDZMFSFCategory median
Daily0.08%0.09%0.06%
1 week0.73%0.66%0.56%
1 month2.61%3.01%1.84%
3 months4.78%9.58%3.29%
6 months10.60%21.00%7.90%
YTD17.75%38.51%17.53%
1 year22.31%45.73%21.48%
3 years152.59%262.52%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DZM vs FSF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FSF (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DZM leads in 1 and FSF leads in 10. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FSF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FSF leads (0.09% vs 0.08%). 1 week: DZM leads (0.73% vs 0.66%). 1 month: FSF leads (3.01% vs 2.61%). 3 months: FSF leads (9.58% vs 4.78%). 6 months: FSF leads (21.00% vs 10.60%). YTD: FSF leads (38.51% vs 17.75%). 1 year: FSF leads (45.73% vs 22.31%). 3 years: FSF leads (262.52% vs 152.59%). Size (TRY): FSF leads (10.6B vs 10.4B). Investors: FSF leads (6,777 vs 3,223). Risk: FSF leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DZM returned 17.75% and FSF returned 38.51%; over the last year DZM returned 22.31% and FSF returned 45.73%. Over the last month DZM returned 2.61% and FSF returned 3.01%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 10.4B with 3,223 investors, while FSF has a size of TRY 10.6B with 6,777 investors. FSF leads in size and FSF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DZM is 3 out of 7 and that of FSF is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.