Yatırımcı.AI

FMG vs NSD Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

FMGNSD
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FMG vs NSD Fund Comparison
MetricFMGNSDCategory median
Daily0.31%0.07%0.06%
1 week1.46%0.49%0.56%
1 month−12.17%2.43%1.84%
3 months−13.38%6.35%3.29%
6 months−29.42%13.95%7.90%
YTD−19.14%22.29%17.53%
1 year20.40%25.22%21.48%
3 years38.30%108.81%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FMG vs NSD Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FMG (QNB Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) and NSD (Nurol Portföy Dördüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FMG leads in 3 and NSD leads in 7. FMG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QNB Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Nurol Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FMG leads (0.31% vs 0.07%). 1 week: FMG leads (1.46% vs 0.49%). 1 month: NSD leads (2.43% vs −12.17%). 3 months: NSD leads (6.35% vs −13.38%). 6 months: NSD leads (13.95% vs −29.42%). YTD: NSD leads (22.29% vs −19.14%). 1 year: NSD leads (25.22% vs 20.40%). 3 years: NSD leads (108.81% vs 38.30%). Size (TRY): NSD leads (10.2B vs 9.9B). Investors: FMG leads (9,003 vs 120).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FMG returned −19.14% and NSD returned 22.29%; over the last year FMG returned 20.40% and NSD returned 25.22%. Over the last month FMG returned −12.17% and NSD returned 2.43%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, FMG has a size of TRY 9.9B with 9,003 investors, while NSD has a size of TRY 10.2B with 120 investors. NSD leads in size and FMG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FMG is 6 out of 7 and that of NSD is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.