Yatırımcı.AI

DZM vs IOG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) side by side.

DZMIOG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DZM vs IOG Fund Comparison
MetricDZMIOGCategory median
Daily−0.02%−2.95%0.01%
1 week0.21%−1.56%0.30%
1 month0.69%−12.75%0.00%
3 months4.87%−2.78%3.96%
6 months9.47%−20.48%8.18%
YTD15.93%−16.29%15.73%
1 year22.35%30.12%20.69%
3 years156.14%310.26%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DZM vs IOG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DZM (Deniz Portföy Beşinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and IOG (İş Portföy Gümüş Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DZM leads in 7 and IOG leads in 4. DZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IOG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DZM leads (−0.02% vs −2.95%). 1 week: DZM leads (0.21% vs −1.56%). 1 month: DZM leads (0.69% vs −12.75%). 3 months: DZM leads (4.87% vs −2.78%). 6 months: DZM leads (9.47% vs −20.48%). YTD: DZM leads (15.93% vs −16.29%). 1 year: IOG leads (30.12% vs 22.35%). 3 years: IOG leads (310.26% vs 156.14%). Size (TRY): IOG leads (9.5B vs 8.7B). Investors: IOG leads (16,865 vs 3,337). Risk: DZM leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DZM returned 15.93% and IOG returned −16.29%; over the last year DZM returned 22.35% and IOG returned 30.12%. Over the last month DZM returned 0.69% and IOG returned −12.75%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, DZM has a size of TRY 8.7B with 3,337 investors, while IOG has a size of TRY 9.5B with 16,865 investors. IOG leads in size and IOG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DZM is 5 out of 7 and that of IOG is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.