Yatırımcı.AI

IMF vs MPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

IMFMPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IMF vs MPN Fund Comparison
MetricIMFMPNCategory median
Daily−0.42%−0.02%0.05%
1 week1.57%0.27%0.44%
1 month−1.02%0.26%0.38%
3 months3.62%2.92%3.95%
6 months7.08%7.52%8.45%
YTD9.98%13.47%16.06%
1 year14.29%19.26%20.98%
3 years94.21%125.61%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IMF vs MPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IMF leads in 2 and MPN leads in 8. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MPN leads (−0.02% vs −0.42%). 1 week: IMF leads (1.57% vs 0.27%). 1 month: MPN leads (0.26% vs −1.02%). 3 months: IMF leads (3.62% vs 2.92%). 6 months: MPN leads (7.52% vs 7.08%). YTD: MPN leads (13.47% vs 9.98%). 1 year: MPN leads (19.26% vs 14.29%). 3 years: MPN leads (125.61% vs 94.21%). Size (TRY): MPN leads (327M vs 315.8M). Investors: MPN leads (222 vs 18).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IMF returned 9.98% and MPN returned 13.47%; over the last year IMF returned 14.29% and MPN returned 19.26%. Over the last month IMF returned −1.02% and MPN returned 0.26%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 315.8M with 18 investors, while MPN has a size of TRY 327M with 222 investors. MPN leads in size and MPN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of MPN is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.