Yatırımcı.AI

DUD vs FJB Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) side by side.

DUDFJB
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DUD vs FJB Fund Comparison
MetricDUDFJBCategory median
Daily−1.40%−0.96%−0.07%
1 week−2.63%0.39%−0.29%
1 month−3.03%3.02%0.00%
3 months−0.36%8.44%4.33%
6 months14.47%43.09%11.90%
YTD10.94%29.87%14.97%
1 year20.66%32.93%21.27%
3 years—295.46%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DUD vs FJB Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DUD (Deniz Portföy Uzun Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, DUD leads in 1 and FJB leads in 8. DUD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FJB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FJB leads (−0.96% vs −1.40%). 1 week: FJB leads (0.39% vs −2.63%). 1 month: FJB leads (3.02% vs −3.03%). 3 months: FJB leads (8.44% vs −0.36%). 6 months: FJB leads (43.09% vs 14.47%). YTD: FJB leads (29.87% vs 10.94%). 1 year: FJB leads (32.93% vs 20.66%). Size (TRY): DUD leads (328.9M vs 317M). Investors: FJB leads (662 vs 237).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DUD returned 10.94% and FJB returned 29.87%; over the last year DUD returned 20.66% and FJB returned 32.93%. Over the last month DUD returned −3.03% and FJB returned 3.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, DUD has a size of TRY 328.9M with 237 investors, while FJB has a size of TRY 317M with 662 investors. DUD leads in size and FJB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DUD is 6 out of 7 and that of FJB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.