DTZ vs VVM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DTZ (Ak Portföy Robotik Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DTZ | VVM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.46% | 0.04% | 0.03% |
| 1 week | −0.46% | 0.76% | 0.83% |
| 1 month | −8.33% | 2.03% | −1.16% |
| 3 months | −13.69% | 7.78% | −0.11% |
| 6 months | −3.63% | 15.17% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 18.43% | 33.65% | 22.14% |
| 1 year | 17.52% | 41.65% | 29.37% |
| 3 years | 153.99% | 233.61% | 154.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DTZ vs VVM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DTZ (Ak Portföy Robotik Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, DTZ leads in 2 and VVM leads in 9. DTZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DTZ leads (1.46% vs 0.04%). 1 week: VVM leads (0.76% vs −0.46%). 1 month: VVM leads (2.03% vs −8.33%). 3 months: VVM leads (7.78% vs −13.69%). 6 months: VVM leads (15.17% vs −3.63%). YTD: VVM leads (33.65% vs 18.43%). 1 year: VVM leads (41.65% vs 17.52%). 3 years: VVM leads (233.61% vs 153.99%). Size (TRY): VVM leads (464.3M vs 460.8M). Investors: DTZ leads (7,180 vs 7,131). Risk: VVM leads (2 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DTZ or VVM?
Year to date DTZ returned 18.43% and VVM returned 33.65%; over the last year DTZ returned 17.52% and VVM returned 41.65%. Over the last month DTZ returned −8.33% and VVM returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DTZ or VVM?
As of November 12, 2026, DTZ has a size of TRY 460.8M with 7,180 investors, while VVM has a size of TRY 464.3M with 7,131 investors. VVM leads in size and DTZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DTZ and VVM mean?
The CMB risk score of DTZ is 6 out of 7 and that of VVM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.