Yatırımcı.AI

CPT vs VVM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CPT (Rota Portföy Çip Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

CPTVVM
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CPT vs VVM Fund Comparison
MetricCPTVVMCategory median
Daily2.90%0.04%0.03%
1 week−0.87%0.76%0.83%
1 month−11.00%2.03%−1.16%
3 months−8.91%7.78%−0.11%
6 months−6.64%15.17%0.00%
YTD51.42%33.65%22.14%
1 year67.10%41.65%29.37%
3 years45.26%233.61%154.49%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CPT vs VVM Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CPT (Rota Portföy Çip Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and VVM (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Muhafazakar Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CPT leads in 4 and VVM leads in 7. CPT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CPT leads (2.90% vs 0.04%). 1 week: VVM leads (0.76% vs −0.87%). 1 month: VVM leads (2.03% vs −11.00%). 3 months: VVM leads (7.78% vs −8.91%). 6 months: VVM leads (15.17% vs −6.64%). YTD: CPT leads (51.42% vs 33.65%). 1 year: CPT leads (67.10% vs 41.65%). 3 years: VVM leads (233.61% vs 45.26%). Size (TRY): VVM leads (464.3M vs 459.4M). Investors: CPT leads (9,902 vs 7,131). Risk: VVM leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CPT returned 51.42% and VVM returned 33.65%; over the last year CPT returned 67.10% and VVM returned 41.65%. Over the last month CPT returned −11.00% and VVM returned 2.03%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, CPT has a size of TRY 459.4M with 9,902 investors, while VVM has a size of TRY 464.3M with 7,131 investors. VVM leads in size and CPT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CPT is 6 out of 7 and that of VVM is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.