Yatırımcı.AI

DNP vs ULH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) side by side.

DNPULH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

DNP vs ULH Fund Comparison
MetricDNPULHCategory median
Daily0.07%−0.01%0.05%
1 week0.69%−1.77%0.44%
1 month2.95%−0.97%0.38%
3 months9.83%4.14%3.95%
6 months20.94%8.27%8.45%
YTD35.58%18.67%16.06%
1 year45.86%19.18%20.98%
3 years—215.29%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the DNP vs ULH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DNP (Deniz Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ULH (Ünlü Portföy Onuncu Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DNP leads in 9 and ULH leads in 1. DNP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ULH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: DNP leads (0.07% vs −0.01%). 1 week: DNP leads (0.69% vs −1.77%). 1 month: DNP leads (2.95% vs −0.97%). 3 months: DNP leads (9.83% vs 4.14%). 6 months: DNP leads (20.94% vs 8.27%). YTD: DNP leads (35.58% vs 18.67%). 1 year: DNP leads (45.86% vs 19.18%). Size (TRY): ULH leads (1.2B vs 903.1M). Investors: DNP leads (383 vs 210). Risk: DNP leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date DNP returned 35.58% and ULH returned 18.67%; over the last year DNP returned 45.86% and ULH returned 19.18%. Over the last month DNP returned 2.95% and ULH returned −0.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, DNP has a size of TRY 903.1M with 383 investors, while ULH has a size of TRY 1.2B with 210 investors. ULH leads in size and DNP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DNP is 2 out of 7 and that of ULH is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.