Yatırımcı.AI

DLZ vs ESG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DLZ (Deniz Portföy Alize Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and ESG (Aktif Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Serbest Fon) side by side.

DLZESG
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

DLZ vs ESG Fund Comparison
MetricDLZESGCategory median
Daily0.02%0.27%0.19%
1 week0.42%0.69%0.42%
1 month1.91%2.72%0.94%
3 months−41.84%−0.62%5.89%
6 months−60.74%8.69%12.86%
YTD−84.36%13.23%18.07%
1 year−87.46%18.54%24.44%
3 years—93.88%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the DLZ vs ESG comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of DLZ (Deniz Portföy Alize Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and ESG (Aktif Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DLZ leads in 0 and ESG leads in 10. DLZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; ESG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ESG leads (0.27% vs 0.02%). 1 week: ESG leads (0.69% vs 0.42%). 1 month: ESG leads (2.72% vs 1.91%). 3 months: ESG leads (−0.62% vs −41.84%). 6 months: ESG leads (8.69% vs −60.74%). YTD: ESG leads (13.23% vs −84.36%). 1 year: ESG leads (18.54% vs −87.46%). Size (TRY): ESG leads (11.3M vs 11M). Investors: ESG leads (75 vs 39). Risk: ESG leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date DLZ returned −84.36% and ESG returned 13.23%; over the last year DLZ returned −87.46% and ESG returned 18.54%. Over the last month DLZ returned 1.91% and ESG returned 2.72%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, DLZ has a size of TRY 11M with 39 investors, while ESG has a size of TRY 11.3M with 75 investors. ESG leads in size and ESG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of DLZ is 7 out of 7 and that of ESG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.