DBA vs TUA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of DBA (Deniz Portföy Altın Fonu) and TUA (TEB Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | DBA | TUA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.82% | −0.91% | −0.87% |
| 1 week | −0.98% | −1.07% | −1.08% |
| 1 month | −3.41% | −3.79% | −3.64% |
| 3 months | 4.13% | 4.12% | 3.88% |
| 6 months | −5.54% | −6.53% | −6.41% |
| YTD | 6.32% | 3.88% | 4.04% |
| 1 year | 11.07% | 8.25% | 9.03% |
| 3 years | 244.17% | 252.59% | 244.17% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the DBA vs TUA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of DBA (Deniz Portföy Altın Fonu) and TUA (TEB Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, DBA leads in 7 and TUA leads in 3. DBA is a Gold Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TUA is a Gold Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: DBA leads (−0.82% vs −0.91%). 1 week: DBA leads (−0.98% vs −1.07%). 1 month: DBA leads (−3.41% vs −3.79%). 3 months: DBA leads (4.13% vs 4.12%). 6 months: DBA leads (−5.54% vs −6.53%). YTD: DBA leads (6.32% vs 3.88%). 1 year: DBA leads (11.07% vs 8.25%). 3 years: TUA leads (252.59% vs 244.17%). Size (TRY): TUA leads (13.7B vs 9.1B). Investors: TUA leads (29,107 vs 23,997).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, DBA or TUA?
Year to date DBA returned 6.32% and TUA returned 3.88%; over the last year DBA returned 11.07% and TUA returned 8.25%. Over the last month DBA returned −3.41% and TUA returned −3.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, DBA or TUA?
As of October 23, 2026, DBA has a size of TRY 9.1B with 23,997 investors, while TUA has a size of TRY 13.7B with 29,107 investors. TUA leads in size and TUA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of DBA and TUA mean?
The CMB risk score of DBA is 6 out of 7 and that of TUA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.