Yatırımcı.AI

CKL vs MET Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CKL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Çoklu Varlık Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.

CKLMET
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CKL vs MET Fund Comparison
MetricCKLMETCategory median
Daily0.15%2.06%1.07%
1 week0.93%2.20%2.38%
1 month−13.72%−6.51%−0.76%
3 months−7.77%−2.22%0.00%
6 months−3.46%1.60%0.00%
YTD20.53%25.59%22.39%
1 year29.00%30.66%28.39%
3 years—210.52%154.30%
Returns are based on prices as of November 10, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CKL vs MET Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CKL (Yapı Kredi Portföy Çoklu Varlık Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CKL leads in 1 and MET leads in 9. CKL is a Variable Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MET leads (2.06% vs 0.15%). 1 week: MET leads (2.20% vs 0.93%). 1 month: MET leads (−6.51% vs −13.72%). 3 months: MET leads (−2.22% vs −7.77%). 6 months: MET leads (1.60% vs −3.46%). YTD: MET leads (25.59% vs 20.53%). 1 year: MET leads (30.66% vs 29.00%). Size (TRY): MET leads (764.8M vs 751.9M). Investors: MET leads (6,136 vs 1,241). Risk: CKL leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CKL returned 20.53% and MET returned 25.59%; over the last year CKL returned 29.00% and MET returned 30.66%. Over the last month CKL returned −13.72% and MET returned −6.51%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 10, 2026, CKL has a size of TRY 751.9M with 1,241 investors, while MET has a size of TRY 764.8M with 6,136 investors. MET leads in size and MET leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CKL is 5 out of 7 and that of MET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.