Yatırımcı.AI

CIN vs GLG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CIN (Aktif Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

CINGLG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CIN vs GLG Fund Comparison
MetricCINGLGCategory median
Today (est.)—−2.95%−2.71%
Daily−0.11%−2.35%0.05%
1 week−2.51%−6.72%0.44%
1 month−7.11%−12.38%0.38%
3 months−1.97%−12.50%3.95%
6 months4.80%−14.44%8.45%
YTD21.65%4.07%16.06%
1 year25.55%16.50%20.98%
3 years7.62%108.31%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CIN vs GLG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CIN (Aktif Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and GLG (Aktif Portföy Capital Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CIN leads in 9 and GLG leads in 1. CIN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GLG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CIN leads (−0.11% vs −2.35%). 1 week: CIN leads (−2.51% vs −6.72%). 1 month: CIN leads (−7.11% vs −12.38%). 3 months: CIN leads (−1.97% vs −12.50%). 6 months: CIN leads (4.80% vs −14.44%). YTD: CIN leads (21.65% vs 4.07%). 1 year: CIN leads (25.55% vs 16.50%). 3 years: GLG leads (108.31% vs 7.62%). Size (TRY): CIN leads (14.1M vs 14M). Investors: CIN leads (405 vs 225).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CIN returned 21.65% and GLG returned 4.07%; over the last year CIN returned 25.55% and GLG returned 16.50%. Over the last month CIN returned −7.11% and GLG returned −12.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, CIN has a size of TRY 14.1M with 405 investors, while GLG has a size of TRY 14M with 225 investors. CIN leads in size and CIN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CIN is 6 out of 7 and that of GLG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.