Yatırımcı.AI

CFO vs EIL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CFOEIL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CFO vs EIL Fund Comparison
MetricCFOEILCategory median
Daily0.08%0.10%0.09%
1 week0.67%0.69%0.69%
1 month2.96%3.11%2.97%
3 months9.84%10.20%9.76%
6 months21.22%21.87%20.90%
YTD36.20%37.13%35.49%
1 year46.42%48.02%45.62%
3 years44.62%268.73%255.49%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CFO vs EIL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and EIL (Astra Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CFO leads in 0 and EIL leads in 10. CFO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EIL leads (0.10% vs 0.08%). 1 week: EIL leads (0.69% vs 0.67%). 1 month: EIL leads (3.11% vs 2.96%). 3 months: EIL leads (10.20% vs 9.84%). 6 months: EIL leads (21.87% vs 21.22%). YTD: EIL leads (37.13% vs 36.20%). 1 year: EIL leads (48.02% vs 46.42%). 3 years: EIL leads (268.73% vs 44.62%). Size (TRY): EIL leads (3.1B vs 1.6B). Investors: EIL leads (1,038 vs 325).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CFO returned 36.20% and EIL returned 37.13%; over the last year CFO returned 46.42% and EIL returned 48.02%. Over the last month CFO returned 2.96% and EIL returned 3.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, CFO has a size of TRY 1.6B with 325 investors, while EIL has a size of TRY 3.1B with 1,038 investors. EIL leads in size and EIL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CFO is 2 out of 7 and that of EIL is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.