CFO vs EPT Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and EPT (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFO | EPT | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
| 1 week | 0.68% | 0.71% | 0.69% |
| 1 month | 3.00% | 3.04% | 2.99% |
| 3 months | 9.86% | 9.89% | 9.77% |
| 6 months | 21.12% | 21.13% | 20.79% |
| YTD | 36.08% | 35.87% | 35.37% |
| 1 year | 46.46% | — | 45.64% |
| 3 years | 44.62% | — | 255.18% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFO vs EPT Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFO (Rota Portföy İkinci Para Piyasası Fonu) and EPT (Emaa Blue Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, CFO leads in 3 and EPT leads in 6. CFO is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EPT is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EPT leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: EPT leads (0.71% vs 0.68%). 1 month: EPT leads (3.04% vs 3.00%). 3 months: EPT leads (9.89% vs 9.86%). 6 months: EPT leads (21.13% vs 21.12%). YTD: CFO leads (36.08% vs 35.87%). Size (TRY): CFO leads (1.6B vs 1.3B). Investors: CFO leads (326 vs 61). Risk: EPT leads (1 vs 2).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFO or EPT?
Year to date CFO returned 36.08% and EPT returned 35.87%; over the last year CFO returned 46.46% and EPT returned —. Over the last month CFO returned 3.00% and EPT returned 3.04%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFO or EPT?
As of October 22, 2026, CFO has a size of TRY 1.6B with 326 investors, while EPT has a size of TRY 1.3B with 61 investors. CFO leads in size and CFO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFO and EPT mean?
The CMB risk score of CFO is 2 out of 7 and that of EPT is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.