CFC vs YVB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YVB (Yapı Kredi Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFC | YVB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.05% | −0.12% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.75% | 0.42% | 0.67% |
| 1 month | 2.25% | 1.83% | 2.45% |
| 3 months | 9.26% | 7.41% | 8.53% |
| 6 months | 14.99% | 13.46% | 16.49% |
| YTD | 25.25% | 12.71% | 27.38% |
| 1 year | 36.38% | 25.03% | 37.36% |
| 3 years | 189.25% | — | 175.88% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFC vs YVB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and YVB (Yapı Kredi Portföy Uzun Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CFC leads in 9 and YVB leads in 1. CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; YVB is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CFC leads (0.05% vs −0.12%). 1 week: CFC leads (0.75% vs 0.42%). 1 month: CFC leads (2.25% vs 1.83%). 3 months: CFC leads (9.26% vs 7.41%). 6 months: CFC leads (14.99% vs 13.46%). YTD: CFC leads (25.25% vs 12.71%). 1 year: CFC leads (36.38% vs 25.03%). Size (TRY): CFC leads (96.4M vs 90.2M). Investors: YVB leads (640 vs 337). Risk: CFC leads (3 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFC or YVB?
Year to date CFC returned 25.25% and YVB returned 12.71%; over the last year CFC returned 36.38% and YVB returned 25.03%. Over the last month CFC returned 2.25% and YVB returned 1.83%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFC or YVB?
As of November 12, 2026, CFC has a size of TRY 96.4M with 337 investors, while YVB has a size of TRY 90.2M with 640 investors. CFC leads in size and YVB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFC and YVB mean?
The CMB risk score of CFC is 3 out of 7 and that of YVB is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.