Yatırımcı.AI

CFC vs TOT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TOT (TEB Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.

CFCTOT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CFC vs TOT Fund Comparison
MetricCFCTOTCategory median
Daily0.05%0.09%0.05%
1 week0.75%0.67%0.67%
1 month2.25%3.02%2.45%
3 months9.26%9.32%8.53%
6 months14.99%20.19%16.49%
YTD25.25%37.55%27.38%
1 year36.38%44.65%37.36%
3 years189.25%234.10%175.88%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CFC vs TOT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TOT (TEB Portföy Özel Sektör Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, CFC leads in 1 and TOT leads in 10. CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; TOT is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TOT leads (0.09% vs 0.05%). 1 week: CFC leads (0.75% vs 0.67%). 1 month: TOT leads (3.02% vs 2.25%). 3 months: TOT leads (9.32% vs 9.26%). 6 months: TOT leads (20.19% vs 14.99%). YTD: TOT leads (37.55% vs 25.25%). 1 year: TOT leads (44.65% vs 36.38%). 3 years: TOT leads (234.10% vs 189.25%). Size (TRY): TOT leads (109.9M vs 96.4M). Investors: TOT leads (627 vs 337). Risk: TOT leads (1 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CFC returned 25.25% and TOT returned 37.55%; over the last year CFC returned 36.38% and TOT returned 44.65%. Over the last month CFC returned 2.25% and TOT returned 3.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, CFC has a size of TRY 96.4M with 337 investors, while TOT has a size of TRY 109.9M with 627 investors. TOT leads in size and TOT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CFC is 3 out of 7 and that of TOT is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.