CFC vs TPF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TPF (Tacirler Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | CFC | TPF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.05% | −2.68% | 0.05% |
| 1 week | 0.75% | −2.09% | 0.67% |
| 1 month | 2.25% | −0.28% | 2.45% |
| 3 months | 9.26% | 5.05% | 8.53% |
| 6 months | 14.99% | 14.97% | 16.49% |
| YTD | 25.25% | 32.93% | 27.38% |
| 1 year | 36.38% | 38.77% | 37.36% |
| 3 years | 189.25% | 194.98% | 175.88% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the CFC vs TPF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of CFC (QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Orta Vadeli Borçlanma Araçları Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and TPF (Tacirler Portföy Borçlanma Araçları Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CFC leads in 5 and TPF leads in 5. CFC is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by QNB Sağlık Hayat Sigorta ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; TPF is a Debt Instruments Fund fund managed by Tacirler Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: CFC leads (0.05% vs −2.68%). 1 week: CFC leads (0.75% vs −2.09%). 1 month: CFC leads (2.25% vs −0.28%). 3 months: CFC leads (9.26% vs 5.05%). 6 months: CFC leads (14.99% vs 14.97%). YTD: TPF leads (32.93% vs 25.25%). 1 year: TPF leads (38.77% vs 36.38%). 3 years: TPF leads (194.98% vs 189.25%). Size (TRY): TPF leads (108.9M vs 96.4M). Investors: TPF leads (446 vs 337).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, CFC or TPF?
Year to date CFC returned 25.25% and TPF returned 32.93%; over the last year CFC returned 36.38% and TPF returned 38.77%. Over the last month CFC returned 2.25% and TPF returned −0.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, CFC or TPF?
As of November 12, 2026, CFC has a size of TRY 96.4M with 337 investors, while TPF has a size of TRY 108.9M with 446 investors. TPF leads in size and TPF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of CFC and TPF mean?
The CMB risk score of CFC is 3 out of 7 and that of TPF is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.