Yatırımcı.AI

BVV vs GPT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

BVVGPT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVV vs GPT Fund Comparison
MetricBVVGPTCategory median
Daily−2.10%−1.51%−0.83%
1 week1.46%0.62%−0.98%
1 month2.00%−1.67%−1.82%
3 months5.59%0.73%3.78%
6 months55.24%35.12%14.04%
YTD58.59%39.39%24.40%
1 year74.83%48.11%34.17%
3 years0.00%32.17%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVV vs GPT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) and GPT (Aktif Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVV leads in 7 and GPT leads in 4. BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPT is a Variable Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GPT leads (−1.51% vs −2.10%). 1 week: BVV leads (1.46% vs 0.62%). 1 month: BVV leads (2.00% vs −1.67%). 3 months: BVV leads (5.59% vs 0.73%). 6 months: BVV leads (55.24% vs 35.12%). YTD: BVV leads (58.59% vs 39.39%). 1 year: BVV leads (74.83% vs 48.11%). 3 years: GPT leads (32.17% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): BVV leads (92.8M vs 88.1M). Investors: GPT leads (2,737 vs 897). Risk: GPT leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVV returned 58.59% and GPT returned 39.39%; over the last year BVV returned 74.83% and GPT returned 48.11%. Over the last month BVV returned 2.00% and GPT returned −1.67%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, BVV has a size of TRY 92.8M with 897 investors, while GPT has a size of TRY 88.1M with 2,737 investors. BVV leads in size and GPT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVV is 6 out of 7 and that of GPT is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.