BPO vs BVV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BPO | BVV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −2.89% | −2.10% | −0.83% |
| 1 week | −1.96% | 1.46% | −0.98% |
| 1 month | −6.06% | 2.00% | −1.82% |
| 3 months | −5.31% | 5.59% | 3.78% |
| 6 months | 5.38% | 55.24% | 14.04% |
| YTD | 25.65% | 58.59% | 24.40% |
| 1 year | 31.97% | 74.83% | 34.17% |
| 3 years | 148.78% | 0.00% | 157.59% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BPO vs BVV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BPO (BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Dinamik Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and BVV (BV Portföy Teknoloji Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BPO leads in 3 and BVV leads in 8. BPO is a Variable Fund fund managed by BNP Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş.; BVV is a Variable Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BVV leads (−2.10% vs −2.89%). 1 week: BVV leads (1.46% vs −1.96%). 1 month: BVV leads (2.00% vs −6.06%). 3 months: BVV leads (5.59% vs −5.31%). 6 months: BVV leads (55.24% vs 5.38%). YTD: BVV leads (58.59% vs 25.65%). 1 year: BVV leads (74.83% vs 31.97%). 3 years: BPO leads (148.78% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): BVV leads (92.8M vs 89M). Investors: BPO leads (933 vs 897). Risk: BPO leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BPO or BVV?
Year to date BPO returned 25.65% and BVV returned 58.59%; over the last year BPO returned 31.97% and BVV returned 74.83%. Over the last month BPO returned −6.06% and BVV returned 2.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BPO or BVV?
As of September 29, 2026, BPO has a size of TRY 89M with 933 investors, while BVV has a size of TRY 92.8M with 897 investors. BVV leads in size and BPO leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BPO and BVV mean?
The CMB risk score of BPO is 5 out of 7 and that of BVV is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.