Yatırımcı.AI

BVM vs FNT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and FNT (Hedef Portföy Model Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

SPK decided to liquidate FNT in bulletin 2026/60 dated September 17, 2026; no buy or redemption orders are executed in the fund. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (October 23, 2026). FNT fund page · SPK bulletin 2026/60

BVMFNT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVM vs FNT Fund Comparison
MetricBVMFNTCategory median
Today (est.)−2.03%—−1.16%
Daily−2.69%0.00%0.01%
1 week−5.21%−98.40%0.30%
1 month−12.75%−98.49%0.00%
3 months−19.37%−98.69%3.96%
6 months−14.00%−98.58%8.18%
YTD−9.62%−98.23%15.73%
1 year−65.43%−98.29%20.69%
3 years−56.87%34.89%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 24, 2026, 06:03.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVM vs FNT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and FNT (Hedef Portföy Model Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVM leads in 7 and FNT leads in 4. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; FNT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Hedef Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FNT leads (0.00% vs −2.69%). 1 week: BVM leads (−5.21% vs −98.40%). 1 month: BVM leads (−12.75% vs −98.49%). 3 months: BVM leads (−19.37% vs −98.69%). 6 months: BVM leads (−14.00% vs −98.58%). YTD: BVM leads (−9.62% vs −98.23%). 1 year: BVM leads (−65.43% vs −98.29%). 3 years: FNT leads (34.89% vs −56.87%). Size (TRY): BVM leads (4.3M vs 4.1M). Investors: FNT leads (1,547 vs 104). Risk: FNT leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVM returned −9.62% and FNT returned −98.23%; over the last year BVM returned −65.43% and FNT returned −98.29%. Over the last month BVM returned −12.75% and FNT returned −98.49%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 4.3M with 104 investors, while FNT has a size of TRY 4.1M with 1,547 investors. BVM leads in size and FNT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of FNT is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.