Yatırımcı.AI

BVM vs IRO Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IRO (İstanbul Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVMIRO
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BVM vs IRO Fund Comparison
MetricBVMIROCategory median
Today (est.)−2.64%—−2.71%
Daily−1.72%0.03%0.05%
1 week−2.51%0.46%0.44%
1 month−10.45%5.37%0.38%
3 months−16.83%5.57%3.95%
6 months−11.62%24.17%8.45%
YTD−7.12%31.47%16.06%
1 year−63.42%30.59%20.98%
3 years−55.68%32.65%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BVM vs IRO Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) and IRO (İstanbul Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVM leads in 1 and IRO leads in 10. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; IRO is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IRO leads (0.03% vs −1.72%). 1 week: IRO leads (0.46% vs −2.51%). 1 month: IRO leads (5.37% vs −10.45%). 3 months: IRO leads (5.57% vs −16.83%). 6 months: IRO leads (24.17% vs −11.62%). YTD: IRO leads (31.47% vs −7.12%). 1 year: IRO leads (30.59% vs −63.42%). 3 years: IRO leads (32.65% vs −55.68%). Size (TRY): IRO leads (5.4M vs 4.4M). Investors: BVM leads (104 vs 51). Risk: IRO leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BVM returned −7.12% and IRO returned 31.47%; over the last year BVM returned −63.42% and IRO returned 30.59%. Over the last month BVM returned −10.45% and IRO returned 5.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 4.4M with 104 investors, while IRO has a size of TRY 5.4M with 51 investors. IRO leads in size and BVM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of IRO is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.