Yatırımcı.AI

BVM vs OTK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and OTK (Oyak Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.

BVMOTK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BVM vs OTK Fund Comparison
MetricBVMOTKCategory median
Today (est.)−1.99%—−1.97%
Daily0.30%0.28%0.19%
1 week−1.09%0.66%0.42%
1 month−4.86%2.89%0.94%
3 months−9.35%9.13%5.89%
6 months9.61%19.76%12.86%
YTD1.90%29.48%18.07%
1 year−64.76%41.55%24.44%
3 years−56.94%158.79%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 11:56.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BVM vs OTK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BVM (Allbatross Portföy Birinci Hisse Senedi Serbest (TL) Fon) and OTK (Oyak Portföy Birinci Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BVM leads in 3 and OTK leads in 8. BVM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; OTK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BVM leads (0.30% vs 0.28%). 1 week: OTK leads (0.66% vs −1.09%). 1 month: OTK leads (2.89% vs −4.86%). 3 months: OTK leads (9.13% vs −9.35%). 6 months: OTK leads (19.76% vs 9.61%). YTD: OTK leads (29.48% vs 1.90%). 1 year: OTK leads (41.55% vs −64.76%). 3 years: OTK leads (158.79% vs −56.94%). Size (TRY): BVM leads (4.9M vs 3.5M). Investors: BVM leads (108 vs 56). Risk: OTK leads (0 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BVM returned 1.90% and OTK returned 29.48%; over the last year BVM returned −64.76% and OTK returned 41.55%. Over the last month BVM returned −4.86% and OTK returned 2.89%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BVM has a size of TRY 4.9M with 108 investors, while OTK has a size of TRY 3.5M with 56 investors. BVM leads in size and BVM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BVM is 7 out of 7 and that of OTK is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.