Yatırımcı.AI

BTK vs TLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BTK (BV Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

BTKTLK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BTK vs TLK Fund Comparison
MetricBTKTLKCategory median
Daily1.77%0.09%0.09%
1 week−0.38%0.65%0.62%
1 month−10.93%2.98%−0.73%
3 months−4.19%9.45%0.80%
6 months3.19%20.58%5.53%
YTD50.88%37.43%29.43%
1 year55.14%44.45%35.02%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BTK vs TLK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BTK (BV Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BTK leads in 4 and TLK leads in 6. BTK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BTK leads (1.77% vs 0.09%). 1 week: TLK leads (0.65% vs −0.38%). 1 month: TLK leads (2.98% vs −10.93%). 3 months: TLK leads (9.45% vs −4.19%). 6 months: TLK leads (20.58% vs 3.19%). YTD: BTK leads (50.88% vs 37.43%). 1 year: BTK leads (55.14% vs 44.45%). Size (TRY): TLK leads (227.7M vs 208.3M). Investors: BTK leads (1,664 vs 1,014). Risk: TLK leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BTK returned 50.88% and TLK returned 37.43%; over the last year BTK returned 55.14% and TLK returned 44.45%. Over the last month BTK returned −10.93% and TLK returned 2.98%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, BTK has a size of TRY 208.3M with 1,664 investors, while TLK has a size of TRY 227.7M with 1,014 investors. TLK leads in size and BTK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BTK is 6 out of 7 and that of TLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.