Yatırımcı.AI

BTK vs KU3 Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BTK (BV Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and KU3 (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Üçüncü Katılım Fonu) side by side.

BTKKU3
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BTK vs KU3 Fund Comparison
MetricBTKKU3Category median
Today (est.)—−1.82%−1.55%
Daily−1.79%−1.73%−0.26%
1 week0.09%−1.10%0.07%
1 month2.14%−3.76%0.00%
3 months8.58%0.46%7.62%
6 months62.71%—16.55%
YTD66.78%13.39%28.23%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 29, 2026, 16:37.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BTK vs KU3 Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BTK (BV Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and KU3 (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Üçüncü Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, BTK leads in 4 and KU3 leads in 4. BTK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by BV Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KU3 is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KU3 leads (−1.73% vs −1.79%). 1 week: BTK leads (0.09% vs −1.10%). 1 month: BTK leads (2.14% vs −3.76%). 3 months: BTK leads (8.58% vs 0.46%). YTD: BTK leads (66.78% vs 13.39%). Size (TRY): KU3 leads (256.4M vs 249M). Investors: KU3 leads (2,643 vs 1,816). Risk: KU3 leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BTK returned 66.78% and KU3 returned 13.39%; over the last year BTK returned — and KU3 returned —. Over the last month BTK returned 2.14% and KU3 returned −3.76%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, BTK has a size of TRY 249M with 1,816 investors, while KU3 has a size of TRY 256.4M with 2,643 investors. KU3 leads in size and KU3 leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BTK is 6 out of 7 and that of KU3 is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.