BRF vs GZV Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZV (Garanti Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BRF | GZV | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.68% | −0.33% | −0.81% |
| 1 week | −1.46% | −0.41% | −1.35% |
| 1 month | −0.89% | −1.38% | −1.46% |
| 3 months | 2.79% | 3.98% | 5.43% |
| 6 months | 24.43% | 20.61% | 13.12% |
| YTD | 31.49% | 22.95% | 21.52% |
| 1 year | 41.84% | 32.25% | 34.01% |
| 3 years | — | 149.36% | 172.01% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BRF vs GZV Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and GZV (Garanti Portföy ESG Sürdürülebilirlik Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BRF leads in 4 and GZV leads in 5. BRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GZV is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GZV leads (−0.33% vs −0.68%). 1 week: GZV leads (−0.41% vs −1.46%). 1 month: BRF leads (−0.89% vs −1.38%). 3 months: GZV leads (3.98% vs 2.79%). 6 months: BRF leads (24.43% vs 20.61%). YTD: BRF leads (31.49% vs 22.95%). 1 year: BRF leads (41.84% vs 32.25%). Size (TRY): GZV leads (96.6M vs 81.1M). Investors: GZV leads (1,322 vs 1,056).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BRF or GZV?
Year to date BRF returned 31.49% and GZV returned 22.95%; over the last year BRF returned 41.84% and GZV returned 32.25%. Over the last month BRF returned −0.89% and GZV returned −1.38%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BRF or GZV?
As of September 29, 2026, BRF has a size of TRY 81.1M with 1,056 investors, while GZV has a size of TRY 96.6M with 1,322 investors. GZV leads in size and GZV leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BRF and GZV mean?
The CMB risk score of BRF is 5 out of 7 and that of GZV is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.