BRF vs IAM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BRF | IAM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.34% | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| 1 week | 0.94% | −0.11% | 0.25% |
| 1 month | −0.21% | −2.44% | −1.05% |
| 3 months | 3.49% | 1.66% | 6.44% |
| 6 months | 23.67% | 13.91% | 13.81% |
| YTD | 32.23% | 15.91% | 22.40% |
| 1 year | 42.81% | 26.36% | 35.81% |
| 3 years | — | 10.12% | 175.03% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BRF vs IAM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BRF (Deniz Portföy Birinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) and IAM (İş Portföy Agresif Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BRF leads in 8 and IAM leads in 1. BRF is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.ş; IAM is a Fund of Funds fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BRF leads (0.34% vs 0.15%). 1 week: BRF leads (0.94% vs −0.11%). 1 month: BRF leads (−0.21% vs −2.44%). 3 months: BRF leads (3.49% vs 1.66%). 6 months: BRF leads (23.67% vs 13.91%). YTD: BRF leads (32.23% vs 15.91%). 1 year: BRF leads (42.81% vs 26.36%). Size (TRY): BRF leads (84.2M vs 74.8M). Investors: IAM leads (2,673 vs 1,061).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BRF or IAM?
Year to date BRF returned 32.23% and IAM returned 15.91%; over the last year BRF returned 42.81% and IAM returned 26.36%. Over the last month BRF returned −0.21% and IAM returned −2.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BRF or IAM?
As of September 28, 2026, BRF has a size of TRY 84.2M with 1,061 investors, while IAM has a size of TRY 74.8M with 2,673 investors. BRF leads in size and IAM leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BRF and IAM mean?
The CMB risk score of BRF is 5 out of 7 and that of IAM is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.