BNL vs KOA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | BNL | KOA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.22% | 0.27% | 0.26% |
| 1 week | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.43% |
| 1 month | −0.11% | 0.78% | 0.58% |
| 3 months | 4.50% | 5.89% | 5.61% |
| 6 months | 14.39% | 16.31% | 15.62% |
| YTD | 18.71% | 21.43% | 20.05% |
| 1 year | 29.03% | 34.49% | 32.76% |
| 3 years | 138.02% | 161.13% | 143.95% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the BNL vs KOA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BNL (Bnp Paribas Cardif Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and KOA (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Standart Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, BNL leads in 0 and KOA leads in 11. BNL is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Bnp Parıbas Cardıf Emeklilik A.Ş.; KOA is a Auto-Enrolment (OKS) Standard Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KOA leads (0.27% vs 0.22%). 1 week: KOA leads (0.57% vs 0.50%). 1 month: KOA leads (0.78% vs −0.11%). 3 months: KOA leads (5.89% vs 4.50%). 6 months: KOA leads (16.31% vs 14.39%). YTD: KOA leads (21.43% vs 18.71%). 1 year: KOA leads (34.49% vs 29.03%). 3 years: KOA leads (161.13% vs 138.02%). Size (TRY): KOA leads (4.2B vs 983M). Investors: KOA leads (398,602 vs 150,007). Risk: KOA leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, BNL or KOA?
Year to date BNL returned 18.71% and KOA returned 21.43%; over the last year BNL returned 29.03% and KOA returned 34.49%. Over the last month BNL returned −0.11% and KOA returned 0.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BNL or KOA?
As of September 28, 2026, BNL has a size of TRY 983M with 150,007 investors, while KOA has a size of TRY 4.2B with 398,602 investors. KOA leads in size and KOA leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BNL and KOA mean?
The CMB risk score of BNL is 5 out of 7 and that of KOA is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.