Yatırımcı.AI

BLD vs YCK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and YCK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Cihangir Serbest Fon) side by side.

BLDYCK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BLD vs YCK Fund Comparison
MetricBLDYCKCategory median
Daily0.09%−2.02%0.07%
1 week0.66%2.99%0.51%
1 month2.98%−16.79%1.66%
3 months9.45%−10.51%3.04%
6 months20.70%−6.83%8.17%
YTD37.90%18.88%17.49%
1 year44.88%25.11%21.23%
3 years—124.30%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BLD vs YCK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and YCK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Cihangir Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 9 and YCK leads in 1. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YCK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BLD leads (0.09% vs −2.02%). 1 week: YCK leads (2.99% vs 0.66%). 1 month: BLD leads (2.98% vs −16.79%). 3 months: BLD leads (9.45% vs −10.51%). 6 months: BLD leads (20.70% vs −6.83%). YTD: BLD leads (37.90% vs 18.88%). 1 year: BLD leads (44.88% vs 25.11%). Size (TRY): BLD leads (374.7M vs 373.9M). Investors: BLD leads (635 vs 156). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BLD returned 37.90% and YCK returned 18.88%; over the last year BLD returned 44.88% and YCK returned 25.11%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.98% and YCK returned −16.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 374.7M with 635 investors, while YCK has a size of TRY 373.9M with 156 investors. BLD leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of YCK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.