Yatırımcı.AI

BIP vs MJL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

BIPMJL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BIP vs MJL Fund Comparison
MetricBIPMJLCategory median
Daily0.11%0.06%0.01%
1 week0.28%0.57%0.30%
1 month2.19%−0.27%0.00%
3 months9.22%4.02%3.96%
6 months20.73%6.66%8.18%
YTD35.77%12.05%15.73%
1 year45.98%16.75%20.69%
3 years—100.50%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BIP vs MJL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BIP leads in 7 and MJL leads in 2. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MJL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BIP leads (0.11% vs 0.06%). 1 week: MJL leads (0.57% vs 0.28%). 1 month: BIP leads (2.19% vs −0.27%). 3 months: BIP leads (9.22% vs 4.02%). 6 months: BIP leads (20.73% vs 6.66%). YTD: BIP leads (35.77% vs 12.05%). 1 year: BIP leads (45.98% vs 16.75%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (830.5M vs 823M). Investors: MJL leads (510 vs 152).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BIP returned 35.77% and MJL returned 12.05%; over the last year BIP returned 45.98% and MJL returned 16.75%. Over the last month BIP returned 2.19% and MJL returned −0.27%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 830.5M with 152 investors, while MJL has a size of TRY 823M with 510 investors. BIP leads in size and MJL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of MJL is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.