BIP vs MT2 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and MT2 (MT Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BIP | MT2 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.28% | −5.67% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.19% | −3.71% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 9.22% | 2.79% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 20.73% | 15.38% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 35.77% | 33.54% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 45.98% | 0.00% | 20.69% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BIP vs MT2 Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and MT2 (MT Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, BIP leads in 8 and MT2 leads in 1. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MT2 is a Hedge Fund fund managed by MT Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: BIP leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: BIP leads (0.28% vs −5.67%). 1 month: BIP leads (2.19% vs −3.71%). 3 months: BIP leads (9.22% vs 2.79%). 6 months: BIP leads (20.73% vs 15.38%). YTD: BIP leads (35.77% vs 33.54%). 1 year: BIP leads (45.98% vs 0.00%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (830.5M vs 806.3M). Investors: MT2 leads (445 vs 152).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BIP or MT2?
Year to date BIP returned 35.77% and MT2 returned 33.54%; over the last year BIP returned 45.98% and MT2 returned 0.00%. Over the last month BIP returned 2.19% and MT2 returned −3.71%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BIP or MT2?
As of October 23, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 830.5M with 152 investors, while MT2 has a size of TRY 806.3M with 445 investors. BIP leads in size and MT2 leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BIP and MT2 mean?
The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of MT2 is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.