BIP vs FZP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | BIP | FZP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.10% | 0.18% | 0.20% |
| 1 week | 0.53% | 0.27% | 0.47% |
| 1 month | 2.66% | 0.73% | 1.35% |
| 3 months | 8.87% | 4.62% | 3.70% |
| 6 months | 20.24% | 12.48% | 8.84% |
| YTD | 37.03% | 26.96% | 16.33% |
| 1 year | 45.62% | 34.63% | 20.23% |
| 3 years | — | 225.00% | 103.91% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the BIP vs FZP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of BIP (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and FZP (Fiba Portföy Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BIP leads in 8 and FZP leads in 2. BIP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FZP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FZP leads (0.18% vs 0.10%). 1 week: BIP leads (0.53% vs 0.27%). 1 month: BIP leads (2.66% vs 0.73%). 3 months: BIP leads (8.87% vs 4.62%). 6 months: BIP leads (20.24% vs 12.48%). YTD: BIP leads (37.03% vs 26.96%). 1 year: BIP leads (45.62% vs 34.63%). Size (TRY): BIP leads (739M vs 728.7M). Investors: FZP leads (455 vs 141). Risk: BIP leads (2 vs 3).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, BIP or FZP?
Year to date BIP returned 37.03% and FZP returned 26.96%; over the last year BIP returned 45.62% and FZP returned 34.63%. Over the last month BIP returned 2.66% and FZP returned 0.73%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, BIP or FZP?
As of November 3, 2026, BIP has a size of TRY 739M with 141 investors, while FZP has a size of TRY 728.7M with 455 investors. BIP leads in size and FZP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of BIP and FZP mean?
The CMB risk score of BIP is 2 out of 7 and that of FZP is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.