Yatırımcı.AI

BGP vs FIL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BGP (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

BGPFIL
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

BGP vs FIL Fund Comparison
MetricBGPFILCategory median
Daily0.29%0.29%0.29%
1 week0.69%0.69%0.70%
1 month3.10%3.08%3.12%
3 months10.01%9.88%10.00%
6 months21.67%21.44%21.60%
YTD32.35%32.08%32.28%
1 year46.53%46.18%46.56%
3 years264.57%258.62%257.27%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the BGP vs FIL comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BGP (Ak Portföy Üçüncü Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and FIL (Fiba Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BGP leads in 8 and FIL leads in 2. BGP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; FIL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: FIL leads (0.29% vs 0.29%). 1 week: FIL leads (0.69% vs 0.69%). 1 month: BGP leads (3.10% vs 3.08%). 3 months: BGP leads (10.01% vs 9.88%). 6 months: BGP leads (21.67% vs 21.44%). YTD: BGP leads (32.35% vs 32.08%). 1 year: BGP leads (46.53% vs 46.18%). 3 years: BGP leads (264.57% vs 258.62%). Size (TRY): BGP leads (50.6B vs 15.3B). Investors: BGP leads (28,685 vs 20,525).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date BGP returned 32.35% and FIL returned 32.08%; over the last year BGP returned 46.53% and FIL returned 46.18%. Over the last month BGP returned 3.10% and FIL returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, BGP has a size of TRY 50.6B with 28,685 investors, while FIL has a size of TRY 15.3B with 20,525 investors. BGP leads in size and BGP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BGP is 1 out of 7 and that of FIL is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.