APG vs GZJ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of APG (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Yenilenebilir Enerji Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | APG | GZJ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.34% | −0.58% | −0.33% |
| 1 week | −1.85% | −1.29% | −0.80% |
| 1 month | −2.53% | −2.32% | −2.70% |
| 3 months | 0.65% | 1.18% | 1.63% |
| 6 months | 3.49% | 3.97% | 4.14% |
| YTD | 20.95% | 17.76% | 20.92% |
| 1 year | 28.35% | 26.45% | 30.34% |
| 3 years | 139.22% | 183.75% | 165.29% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the APG vs GZJ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of APG (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Yenilenebilir Enerji Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GZJ (Garanti Portföy İkinci Fon Sepeti Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, APG leads in 4 and GZJ leads in 7. APG is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GZJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: APG leads (0.34% vs −0.58%). 1 week: GZJ leads (−1.29% vs −1.85%). 1 month: GZJ leads (−2.32% vs −2.53%). 3 months: GZJ leads (1.18% vs 0.65%). 6 months: GZJ leads (3.97% vs 3.49%). YTD: APG leads (20.95% vs 17.76%). 1 year: APG leads (28.35% vs 26.45%). 3 years: GZJ leads (183.75% vs 139.22%). Size (TRY): GZJ leads (1.6B vs 1.3B). Investors: APG leads (78,243 vs 4,689). Risk: GZJ leads (4 vs 5).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, APG or GZJ?
Year to date APG returned 20.95% and GZJ returned 17.76%; over the last year APG returned 28.35% and GZJ returned 26.45%. Over the last month APG returned −2.53% and GZJ returned −2.32%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, APG or GZJ?
As of October 22, 2026, APG has a size of TRY 1.3B with 78,243 investors, while GZJ has a size of TRY 1.6B with 4,689 investors. GZJ leads in size and APG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of APG and GZJ mean?
The CMB risk score of APG is 5 out of 7 and that of GZJ is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.