AMZ vs NHA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AMZ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AMZ | NHA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.55% | −0.40% | −0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.67% | −0.73% | −0.74% |
| 1 month | −2.91% | −3.08% | −3.05% |
| 3 months | 2.47% | 2.63% | 2.83% |
| 6 months | −4.21% | −4.13% | −4.12% |
| YTD | 1.78% | 2.76% | 2.06% |
| 1 year | 12.34% | 12.54% | 12.48% |
| 3 years | 239.22% | 249.69% | 236.27% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AMZ vs NHA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AMZ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and NHA (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AMZ leads in 4 and NHA leads in 6. AMZ is a Gold Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; NHA is a Gold Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NHA leads (−0.40% vs −0.55%). 1 week: AMZ leads (−0.67% vs −0.73%). 1 month: AMZ leads (−2.91% vs −3.08%). 3 months: NHA leads (2.63% vs 2.47%). 6 months: NHA leads (−4.13% vs −4.21%). YTD: NHA leads (2.76% vs 1.78%). 1 year: NHA leads (12.54% vs 12.34%). 3 years: NHA leads (249.69% vs 239.22%). Size (TRY): AMZ leads (133B vs 21B). Investors: AMZ leads (709,343 vs 117,735).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AMZ or NHA?
Year to date AMZ returned 1.78% and NHA returned 2.76%; over the last year AMZ returned 12.34% and NHA returned 12.54%. Over the last month AMZ returned −2.91% and NHA returned −3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AMZ or NHA?
As of November 2, 2026, AMZ has a size of TRY 133B with 709,343 investors, while NHA has a size of TRY 21B with 117,735 investors. AMZ leads in size and AMZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AMZ and NHA mean?
The CMB risk score of AMZ is 6 out of 7 and that of NHA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.