Yatırımcı.AI

AMZ vs OJK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AMZ (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

AMZOJK
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

AMZ vs OJK Fund Comparison
MetricAMZOJKCategory median
Daily0.47%0.46%0.49%
1 week−1.55%−1.69%−1.65%
1 month−5.59%−5.09%−5.35%
3 months10.32%10.93%10.41%
6 months1.97%4.39%2.13%
YTD6.95%10.86%8.20%
1 year28.42%32.06%27.66%
3 years287.47%306.52%287.47%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the AMZ vs OJK comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AMZ (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Altın Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and OJK (Qnb Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AMZ leads in 4 and OJK leads in 6. AMZ is a Gold Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; OJK is a Gold Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AMZ leads (0.47% vs 0.46%). 1 week: AMZ leads (−1.55% vs −1.69%). 1 month: OJK leads (−5.09% vs −5.59%). 3 months: OJK leads (10.93% vs 10.32%). 6 months: OJK leads (4.39% vs 1.97%). YTD: OJK leads (10.86% vs 6.95%). 1 year: OJK leads (32.06% vs 28.42%). 3 years: OJK leads (306.52% vs 287.47%). Size (TRY): AMZ leads (141.9B vs 45.8B). Investors: AMZ leads (714,776 vs 26,908).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date AMZ returned 6.95% and OJK returned 10.86%; over the last year AMZ returned 28.42% and OJK returned 32.06%. Over the last month AMZ returned −5.59% and OJK returned −5.09%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, AMZ has a size of TRY 141.9B with 714,776 investors, while OJK has a size of TRY 45.8B with 26,908 investors. AMZ leads in size and AMZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AMZ is 6 out of 7 and that of OJK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.