Yatırımcı.AI

ALU vs IJC Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IJC (İş Portföy Yarı İletken Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

ALUIJC
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ALU vs IJC Fund Comparison
MetricALUIJCCategory median
Daily0.54%2.11%0.32%
1 week1.04%2.76%0.42%
1 month−6.22%−1.99%−1.48%
3 months3.11%−7.78%4.48%
6 months13.89%43.78%14.82%
YTD23.77%62.46%25.33%
1 year29.69%65.02%35.72%
3 years114.82%257.10%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ALU vs IJC Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and IJC (İş Portföy Yarı İletken Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ALU leads in 2 and IJC leads in 8. ALU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; IJC is a Variable Fund fund managed by İş Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IJC leads (2.11% vs 0.54%). 1 week: IJC leads (2.76% vs 1.04%). 1 month: IJC leads (−1.99% vs −6.22%). 3 months: ALU leads (3.11% vs −7.78%). 6 months: IJC leads (43.78% vs 13.89%). YTD: IJC leads (62.46% vs 23.77%). 1 year: IJC leads (65.02% vs 29.69%). 3 years: IJC leads (257.10% vs 114.82%). Size (TRY): IJC leads (4.2B vs 4B). Investors: ALU leads (180,625 vs 39,933).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ALU returned 23.77% and IJC returned 62.46%; over the last year ALU returned 29.69% and IJC returned 65.02%. Over the last month ALU returned −6.22% and IJC returned −1.99%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ALU has a size of TRY 4B with 180,625 investors, while IJC has a size of TRY 4.2B with 39,933 investors. IJC leads in size and ALU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ALU is 6 out of 7 and that of IJC is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.