Yatırımcı.AI

ALU vs HSA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HSA (Hsbc Portföy Değişken (TL) Fon) side by side.

ALUHSA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ALU vs HSA Fund Comparison
MetricALUHSACategory median
Today (est.)—−2.11%−1.89%
Daily0.54%0.62%0.32%
1 week1.04%1.00%0.42%
1 month−6.22%0.24%−1.48%
3 months3.11%2.98%4.48%
6 months13.89%14.78%14.82%
YTD23.77%23.42%25.33%
1 year29.69%26.14%35.72%
3 years114.82%121.39%161.05%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Sep 28, 2026, 16:07.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ALU vs HSA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and HSA (Hsbc Portföy Değişken (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ALU leads in 6 and HSA leads in 5. ALU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; HSA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Hsbc Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: HSA leads (0.62% vs 0.54%). 1 week: ALU leads (1.04% vs 1.00%). 1 month: HSA leads (0.24% vs −6.22%). 3 months: ALU leads (3.11% vs 2.98%). 6 months: HSA leads (14.78% vs 13.89%). YTD: ALU leads (23.77% vs 23.42%). 1 year: ALU leads (29.69% vs 26.14%). 3 years: HSA leads (121.39% vs 114.82%). Size (TRY): ALU leads (4B vs 4B). Investors: ALU leads (180,625 vs 2,280). Risk: HSA leads (0 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ALU returned 23.77% and HSA returned 23.42%; over the last year ALU returned 29.69% and HSA returned 26.14%. Over the last month ALU returned −6.22% and HSA returned 0.24%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ALU has a size of TRY 4B with 180,625 investors, while HSA has a size of TRY 4B with 2,280 investors. ALU leads in size and ALU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ALU is 6 out of 7 and that of HSA is 0. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.