ALU vs GEA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALU (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEA (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ALU | GEA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 1.51% | 1.75% | 0.21% |
| 1 week | 2.44% | 2.94% | 1.17% |
| 1 month | −4.89% | −5.78% | −0.49% |
| 3 months | −8.37% | −18.67% | −0.87% |
| 6 months | −8.81% | −20.13% | 0.68% |
| YTD | 14.85% | 5.31% | 22.53% |
| 1 year | 23.07% | 11.26% | 29.33% |
| 3 years | 100.61% | 89.14% | 156.25% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ALU vs GEA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ALU (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEA (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ALU leads in 8 and GEA leads in 3. ALU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GEA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GEA leads (1.75% vs 1.51%). 1 week: GEA leads (2.94% vs 2.44%). 1 month: ALU leads (−4.89% vs −5.78%). 3 months: ALU leads (−8.37% vs −18.67%). 6 months: ALU leads (−8.81% vs −20.13%). YTD: ALU leads (14.85% vs 5.31%). 1 year: ALU leads (23.07% vs 11.26%). 3 years: ALU leads (100.61% vs 89.14%). Size (TRY): ALU leads (3.7B vs 3.6B). Investors: ALU leads (177,206 vs 69,016). Risk: GEA leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ALU or GEA?
Year to date ALU returned 14.85% and GEA returned 5.31%; over the last year ALU returned 23.07% and GEA returned 11.26%. Over the last month ALU returned −4.89% and GEA returned −5.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ALU or GEA?
As of November 13, 2026, ALU has a size of TRY 3.7B with 177,206 investors, while GEA has a size of TRY 3.6B with 69,016 investors. ALU leads in size and ALU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ALU and GEA mean?
The CMB risk score of ALU is 6 out of 7 and that of GEA is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.