ALU vs GEA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEA (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ALU | GEA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.54% | 0.69% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | 1.04% | −0.94% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −6.22% | −13.92% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | 3.11% | −6.53% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 13.89% | 3.98% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 23.77% | 18.44% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 29.69% | 25.71% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 114.82% | 108.78% | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ALU vs GEA Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ALU (Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GEA (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Katılım Hisse Senedi Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, ALU leads in 9 and GEA leads in 2. ALU is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allıanz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; GEA is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: GEA leads (0.69% vs 0.54%). 1 week: ALU leads (1.04% vs −0.94%). 1 month: ALU leads (−6.22% vs −13.92%). 3 months: ALU leads (3.11% vs −6.53%). 6 months: ALU leads (13.89% vs 3.98%). YTD: ALU leads (23.77% vs 18.44%). 1 year: ALU leads (29.69% vs 25.71%). 3 years: ALU leads (114.82% vs 108.78%). Size (TRY): ALU leads (4B vs 3.8B). Investors: ALU leads (180,625 vs 68,409). Risk: GEA leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ALU or GEA?
Year to date ALU returned 23.77% and GEA returned 18.44%; over the last year ALU returned 29.69% and GEA returned 25.71%. Over the last month ALU returned −6.22% and GEA returned −13.92%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ALU or GEA?
As of September 28, 2026, ALU has a size of TRY 4B with 180,625 investors, while GEA has a size of TRY 3.8B with 68,409 investors. ALU leads in size and ALU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ALU and GEA mean?
The CMB risk score of ALU is 6 out of 7 and that of GEA is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.