Yatırımcı.AI

AIS vs GPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AIS (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

AISGPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AIS vs GPN Fund Comparison
MetricAISGPNCategory median
Daily0.11%0.10%−0.60%
1 week0.69%0.67%−0.86%
1 month2.97%2.97%−0.33%
3 months9.79%9.81%4.42%
6 months21.06%21.12%12.01%
YTD36.04%35.51%28.30%
1 year46.16%45.41%34.68%
3 years222.06%—158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AIS vs GPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AIS (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Fonu) and GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, AIS leads in 7 and GPN leads in 2. AIS is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; GPN is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AIS leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: AIS leads (0.69% vs 0.67%). 1 month: AIS leads (2.97% vs 2.97%). 3 months: GPN leads (9.81% vs 9.79%). 6 months: GPN leads (21.12% vs 21.06%). YTD: AIS leads (36.04% vs 35.51%). 1 year: AIS leads (46.16% vs 45.41%). Size (TRY): AIS leads (9B vs 5.8B). Investors: AIS leads (27,517 vs 7,084).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AIS returned 36.04% and GPN returned 35.51%; over the last year AIS returned 46.16% and GPN returned 45.41%. Over the last month AIS returned 2.97% and GPN returned 2.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, AIS has a size of TRY 9B with 27,517 investors, while GPN has a size of TRY 5.8B with 7,084 investors. AIS leads in size and AIS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AIS is 1 out of 7 and that of GPN is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.