Yatırımcı.AI

GPN vs KJM Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KJM (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

GPNKJM
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

GPN vs KJM Fund Comparison
MetricGPNKJMCategory median
Daily0.27%0.26%0.29%
1 week0.67%−0.72%0.41%
1 month3.12%−4.93%0.20%
3 months9.97%11.88%8.83%
6 months21.61%0.01%16.56%
YTD31.95%4.43%27.81%
1 year—45.36%39.52%
3 years—319.82%172.10%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the GPN vs KJM comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and KJM (Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GPN leads in 6 and KJM leads in 3. GPN is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KJM is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Katılım Emeklilik ve Hayat A.ş.

Highlights: Daily: GPN leads (0.27% vs 0.26%). 1 week: GPN leads (0.67% vs −0.72%). 1 month: GPN leads (3.12% vs −4.93%). 3 months: KJM leads (11.88% vs 9.97%). 6 months: GPN leads (21.61% vs 0.01%). YTD: GPN leads (31.95% vs 4.43%). Size (TRY): KJM leads (6.4B vs 5.5B). Investors: KJM leads (116,633 vs 5,603). Risk: GPN leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date GPN returned 31.95% and KJM returned 4.43%; over the last year GPN returned — and KJM returned 45.36%. Over the last month GPN returned 3.12% and KJM returned −4.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, GPN has a size of TRY 5.5B with 5,603 investors, while KJM has a size of TRY 6.4B with 116,633 investors. KJM leads in size and KJM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GPN is 1 out of 7 and that of KJM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.