GPN vs PPK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and PPK (Qnb Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | GPN | PPK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.27% | 0.28% | 0.29% |
| 1 week | 0.67% | 0.65% | 0.41% |
| 1 month | 3.12% | 3.08% | 0.20% |
| 3 months | 9.97% | 9.83% | 8.83% |
| 6 months | 21.61% | 21.42% | 16.56% |
| YTD | 31.95% | 31.84% | 27.81% |
| 1 year | — | 45.34% | 39.52% |
| 3 years | — | 22.08% | 172.10% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the GPN vs PPK comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GPN (Garanti Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) and PPK (Qnb Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, GPN leads in 6 and PPK leads in 2. GPN is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Qnb Finans Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PPK leads (0.28% vs 0.27%). 1 week: GPN leads (0.67% vs 0.65%). 1 month: GPN leads (3.12% vs 3.08%). 3 months: GPN leads (9.97% vs 9.83%). 6 months: GPN leads (21.61% vs 21.42%). YTD: GPN leads (31.95% vs 31.84%). Size (TRY): PPK leads (5.7B vs 5.5B). Investors: GPN leads (5,603 vs 3,105).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, GPN or PPK?
Year to date GPN returned 31.95% and PPK returned 31.84%; over the last year GPN returned — and PPK returned 45.34%. Over the last month GPN returned 3.12% and PPK returned 3.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GPN or PPK?
As of September 28, 2026, GPN has a size of TRY 5.5B with 5,603 investors, while PPK has a size of TRY 5.7B with 3,105 investors. PPK leads in size and GPN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GPN and PPK mean?
The CMB risk score of GPN is 1 out of 7 and that of PPK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.