AED vs EVM Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AED (Ata Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | AED | EVM | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | 1.06% | — | 0.89% |
| Daily | −0.08% | 1.12% | 0.03% |
| 1 week | 2.42% | −1.20% | 0.83% |
| 1 month | −2.05% | −5.41% | −1.16% |
| 3 months | −2.50% | −4.01% | −0.11% |
| 6 months | −3.48% | −2.08% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 24.59% | 8.23% | 22.14% |
| 1 year | 29.67% | — | 29.37% |
| 3 years | 121.84% | — | 154.49% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the AED vs EVM Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of AED (Ata Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and EVM (Deniz Portföy Enerji ve Madencilik Sektörü Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, AED leads in 5 and EVM leads in 3. AED is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; EVM is a Variable Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: EVM leads (1.12% vs −0.08%). 1 week: AED leads (2.42% vs −1.20%). 1 month: AED leads (−2.05% vs −5.41%). 3 months: AED leads (−2.50% vs −4.01%). 6 months: EVM leads (−2.08% vs −3.48%). YTD: AED leads (24.59% vs 8.23%). Size (TRY): EVM leads (55.2M vs 52.7M). Investors: AED leads (1,205 vs 499).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, AED or EVM?
Year to date AED returned 24.59% and EVM returned 8.23%; over the last year AED returned 29.67% and EVM returned —. Over the last month AED returned −2.05% and EVM returned −5.41%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, AED or EVM?
As of November 12, 2026, AED has a size of TRY 52.7M with 1,205 investors, while EVM has a size of TRY 55.2M with 499 investors. EVM leads in size and AED leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of AED and EVM mean?
The CMB risk score of AED is 6 out of 7 and that of EVM is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.