ACU vs TPP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | ACU | TPP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.02% | −0.08% | 0.07% |
| 1 week | 0.47% | 0.92% | 0.51% |
| 1 month | 2.28% | −1.40% | 1.66% |
| 3 months | 6.56% | −2.61% | 3.04% |
| 6 months | 13.38% | 6.78% | 8.17% |
| YTD | 22.05% | 24.67% | 17.49% |
| 1 year | 25.10% | 45.58% | 21.23% |
| 3 years | 110.89% | 236.00% | 105.57% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the ACU vs TPP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and TPP (TEB Portföy Pusula Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACU leads in 4 and TPP leads in 6. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by TEB Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: ACU leads (0.02% vs −0.08%). 1 week: TPP leads (0.92% vs 0.47%). 1 month: ACU leads (2.28% vs −1.40%). 3 months: ACU leads (6.56% vs −2.61%). 6 months: ACU leads (13.38% vs 6.78%). YTD: TPP leads (24.67% vs 22.05%). 1 year: TPP leads (45.58% vs 25.10%). 3 years: TPP leads (236.00% vs 110.89%). Size (TRY): TPP leads (1.6B vs 1.5B). Investors: TPP leads (317 vs 116).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, ACU or TPP?
Year to date ACU returned 22.05% and TPP returned 24.67%; over the last year ACU returned 25.10% and TPP returned 45.58%. Over the last month ACU returned 2.28% and TPP returned −1.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, ACU or TPP?
As of November 13, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 116 investors, while TPP has a size of TRY 1.6B with 317 investors. TPP leads in size and TPP leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of ACU and TPP mean?
The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of TPP is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.