Yatırımcı.AI

ACU vs MJL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) side by side.

ACUMJL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ACU vs MJL Fund Comparison
MetricACUMJLCategory median
Daily0.08%−0.70%0.06%
1 week0.51%−0.43%0.56%
1 month2.52%1.66%1.84%
3 months6.60%2.28%3.29%
6 months13.41%6.07%7.90%
YTD22.03%12.79%17.53%
1 year25.12%17.01%21.48%
3 years110.84%96.16%105.66%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ACU vs MJL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ACU (İstanbul Portföy Urartu Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MJL (Aktif Portföy Aktif Serbest (Döviz-Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ACU leads in 9 and MJL leads in 1. ACU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MJL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ACU leads (0.08% vs −0.70%). 1 week: ACU leads (0.51% vs −0.43%). 1 month: ACU leads (2.52% vs 1.66%). 3 months: ACU leads (6.60% vs 2.28%). 6 months: ACU leads (13.41% vs 6.07%). YTD: ACU leads (22.03% vs 12.79%). 1 year: ACU leads (25.12% vs 17.01%). 3 years: ACU leads (110.84% vs 96.16%). Size (TRY): ACU leads (1.5B vs 1.5B). Investors: MJL leads (497 vs 116).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ACU returned 22.03% and MJL returned 12.79%; over the last year ACU returned 25.12% and MJL returned 17.01%. Over the last month ACU returned 2.52% and MJL returned 1.66%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, ACU has a size of TRY 1.5B with 116 investors, while MJL has a size of TRY 1.5B with 497 investors. ACU leads in size and MJL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ACU is 5 out of 7 and that of MJL is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.