Yatırımcı.AI

ABE vs GGJ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ABE (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.ş.s&p 500 Yabancı BYF Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

ABEGGJ
StockFund

If you had invested TRY 10,000

Metric comparison

ABE vs GGJ Fund Comparison
MetricABEGGJCategory median
Daily0.44%0.71%0.00%
1 week0.98%−3.22%−0.18%
1 month0.43%−5.93%−1.21%
3 months7.72%15.20%6.24%
6 months25.18%−1.85%13.40%
YTD23.93%−3.59%22.20%
1 year34.46%—35.20%
3 years204.70%—174.60%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular comparisons

Related pages

About the ABE vs GGJ comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ABE (Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.ş.s&p 500 Yabancı BYF Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and GGJ (Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. Gümüş Fon Sepeti Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, ABE leads in 7 and GGJ leads in 2. ABE is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Anadolu Hayat Emeklilik A.Ş.; GGJ is a Fund of Funds fund managed by Garanti Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GGJ leads (0.71% vs 0.44%). 1 week: ABE leads (0.98% vs −3.22%). 1 month: ABE leads (0.43% vs −5.93%). 3 months: GGJ leads (15.20% vs 7.72%). 6 months: ABE leads (25.18% vs −1.85%). YTD: ABE leads (23.93% vs −3.59%). Size (TRY): ABE leads (11.5B vs 8.5B). Investors: ABE leads (226,635 vs 141,575). Risk: ABE leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently asked questions

Year to date ABE returned 23.93% and GGJ returned −3.59%; over the last year ABE returned 34.46% and GGJ returned —. Over the last month ABE returned 0.43% and GGJ returned −5.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, ABE has a size of TRY 11.5B with 226,635 investors, while GGJ has a size of TRY 8.5B with 141,575 investors. ABE leads in size and ABE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ABE is 6 out of 7 and that of GGJ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.