Yatırımcı.AI

AAS vs IZS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) side by side.

AASIZS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAS vs IZS Fund Comparison
MetricAASIZSCategory median
Daily−0.54%0.10%0.01%
1 week−0.06%0.59%0.30%
1 month−0.64%2.69%0.00%
3 months8.10%17.57%3.96%
6 months15.63%27.77%8.18%
YTD25.27%21.02%15.73%
1 year32.20%24.76%20.69%
3 years124.79%146.58%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAS vs IZS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and IZS (İstanbul Portföy Altıncı Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AAS leads in 5 and IZS leads in 6. AAS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; IZS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IZS leads (0.10% vs −0.54%). 1 week: IZS leads (0.59% vs −0.06%). 1 month: IZS leads (2.69% vs −0.64%). 3 months: IZS leads (17.57% vs 8.10%). 6 months: IZS leads (27.77% vs 15.63%). YTD: AAS leads (25.27% vs 21.02%). 1 year: AAS leads (32.20% vs 24.76%). 3 years: IZS leads (146.58% vs 124.79%). Size (TRY): AAS leads (16.7M vs 11.7M). Investors: AAS leads (125 vs 52). Risk: AAS leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAS returned 25.27% and IZS returned 21.02%; over the last year AAS returned 32.20% and IZS returned 24.76%. Over the last month AAS returned −0.64% and IZS returned 2.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, AAS has a size of TRY 16.7M with 125 investors, while IZS has a size of TRY 11.7M with 52 investors. AAS leads in size and AAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAS is 5 out of 7 and that of IZS is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.