Yatırımcı.AI

AAS vs OLA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) side by side.

AASOLA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAS vs OLA Fund Comparison
MetricAASOLACategory median
Daily−0.03%−0.02%0.05%
1 week−0.07%0.51%0.44%
1 month0.44%−1.06%0.38%
3 months9.08%2.21%3.95%
6 months16.26%3.25%8.45%
YTD25.95%6.85%16.06%
1 year32.72%10.73%20.98%
3 years126.02%93.73%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAS vs OLA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAS (Ata Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fonu) and OLA (Osmanlı Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz- Avro) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AAS leads in 7 and OLA leads in 3. AAS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; OLA is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OLA leads (−0.02% vs −0.03%). 1 week: OLA leads (0.51% vs −0.07%). 1 month: AAS leads (0.44% vs −1.06%). 3 months: AAS leads (9.08% vs 2.21%). 6 months: AAS leads (16.26% vs 3.25%). YTD: AAS leads (25.95% vs 6.85%). 1 year: AAS leads (32.72% vs 10.73%). 3 years: AAS leads (126.02% vs 93.73%). Size (TRY): OLA leads (19M vs 16.9M). Investors: AAS leads (126 vs 24).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAS returned 25.95% and OLA returned 6.85%; over the last year AAS returned 32.72% and OLA returned 10.73%. Over the last month AAS returned 0.44% and OLA returned −1.06%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, AAS has a size of TRY 16.9M with 126 investors, while OLA has a size of TRY 19M with 24 investors. OLA leads in size and AAS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAS is 5 out of 7 and that of OLA is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.