Yatırımcı.AI

AAL vs UPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and UPP (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

AALUPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAL vs UPP Fund Comparison
MetricAALUPPCategory median
Daily0.11%0.10%0.10%
1 week0.71%0.69%0.71%
1 month3.21%3.14%3.17%
3 months8.29%9.91%10.01%
6 months17.77%21.01%21.27%
YTD28.75%32.38%32.49%
1 year42.48%46.06%46.26%
3 years247.50%256.10%255.20%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAL vs UPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and UPP (Ünlü Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AAL leads in 4 and UPP leads in 6. AAL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AAL leads (0.11% vs 0.10%). 1 week: AAL leads (0.71% vs 0.69%). 1 month: AAL leads (3.21% vs 3.14%). 3 months: UPP leads (9.91% vs 8.29%). 6 months: UPP leads (21.01% vs 17.77%). YTD: UPP leads (32.38% vs 28.75%). 1 year: UPP leads (46.06% vs 42.48%). 3 years: UPP leads (256.10% vs 247.50%). Size (TRY): UPP leads (2.4B vs 1.7B). Investors: AAL leads (4,243 vs 846).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAL returned 28.75% and UPP returned 32.38%; over the last year AAL returned 42.48% and UPP returned 46.06%. Over the last month AAL returned 3.21% and UPP returned 3.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, AAL has a size of TRY 1.7B with 4,243 investors, while UPP has a size of TRY 2.4B with 846 investors. UPP leads in size and AAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAL is 1 out of 7 and that of UPP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.