Yatırımcı.AI

AAL vs PPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) side by side.

AALPPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AAL vs PPP Fund Comparison
MetricAALPPPCategory median
Daily0.10%0.10%0.09%
1 week0.70%0.71%0.69%
1 month3.05%3.00%2.97%
3 months8.40%9.79%9.76%
6 months17.63%21.00%20.90%
YTD31.88%35.80%35.49%
1 year42.00%45.93%45.62%
3 years248.04%80.54%255.49%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AAL vs PPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AAL (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) and PPP (Perform Portföy Para Piyasası (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AAL leads in 4 and PPP leads in 7. AAL is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PPP is a Money Market Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PPP leads (0.10% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PPP leads (0.71% vs 0.70%). 1 month: AAL leads (3.05% vs 3.00%). 3 months: PPP leads (9.79% vs 8.40%). 6 months: PPP leads (21.00% vs 17.63%). YTD: PPP leads (35.80% vs 31.88%). 1 year: PPP leads (45.93% vs 42.00%). 3 years: AAL leads (248.04% vs 80.54%). Size (TRY): PPP leads (2B vs 1.7B). Investors: AAL leads (4,236 vs 300). Risk: AAL leads (1 vs 2).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AAL returned 31.88% and PPP returned 35.80%; over the last year AAL returned 42.00% and PPP returned 45.93%. Over the last month AAL returned 3.05% and PPP returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, AAL has a size of TRY 1.7B with 4,236 investors, while PPP has a size of TRY 2B with 300 investors. PPP leads in size and AAL leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AAL is 1 out of 7 and that of PPP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.